Columbia River spring chinook sonar images.

A place for readers to talk about river fishing in Washington.
Forum rules
Forum Post Guidelines: This Forum is rated “Family Friendly”. Civil discussions are encouraged and welcomed. Name calling, negative, harassing, or threatening comments will be removed and may result in suspension or IP Ban without notice. Please refer to the Terms of Service and Forum Guidelines post for more information. Thank you
Post Reply
User avatar
rseas
Commander
Posts: 578
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:19 pm
Location: Skagit County

Columbia River spring chinook sonar images.

Post by rseas » Wed Apr 07, 2010 7:13 pm

Although opportunity was in our favor we didn’t manage to bring a fish to the net. Very strange couple days of fishing. We were using custom tied 3 hook mooching leaders and still getting short bites. I would not take the rods out of the holder until the fish was actively pulling out line and we still farmed everything hooked. That said great trip and thought that I would share our Columbia River springer sonar images. So with out further a due…for your drooling enjoyment!
Attachments
S00030_001.png
S00030_001.png (58.86 KiB) Viewed 5015 times
S00027_001.png
S00027_001.png (152.57 KiB) Viewed 5017 times
S00025_001.png
S00025_001.png (100.92 KiB) Viewed 5018 times
S00024_001.png
S00024_001.png (141.24 KiB) Viewed 5018 times
S00019_001.png
S00019_001.png (125.45 KiB) Viewed 5018 times

User avatar
Toni
Sponsor
Sponsor
Posts: 3186
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 10:47 pm
Location: Graham

RE:Columbia River spring chinook sonar images.

Post by Toni » Wed Apr 07, 2010 7:21 pm

looks pretty.
Look for Wannafish A Lure on FaceBook

He said, “Throw your net on the right side of the boat and you will find some.” When they did, they were unable to haul the net in because of the large number of fish.

jbball50
Commander
Posts: 457
Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 1:55 pm
Location: Bremerton,WA

RE:Columbia River spring chinook sonar images.

Post by jbball50 » Wed Apr 07, 2010 7:35 pm

Cool pictures, I wonder if our gps/fishfinder can do this on our big boat. Yeah they always say don't get the rods when they're just hitting it until they completely take it themselves and have them hooked by themselves when fishing down at the Columbia. Where were you fishing at on the river?

User avatar
rseas
Commander
Posts: 578
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:19 pm
Location: Skagit County

RE:Columbia River spring chinook sonar images.

Post by rseas » Wed Apr 07, 2010 8:20 pm

We were fishing various spots out of Cathlamet, I'll post a report tomorrow.

User avatar
The Quadfather
Rear Admiral One Star
Posts: 3868
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 2:27 pm
Location: Carkeek Park, North Seattle
Contact:

RE:Columbia River spring chinook sonar images.

Post by The Quadfather » Wed Apr 07, 2010 8:33 pm

Wow! I thought I had a pretty decent f.f. Very nice images indeed you have.:bball:
"Honey Badger don't care.. Honey Badger don't give a ....."

4r7wHMg5Yjg

User avatar
code3daddy
Petty Officer
Posts: 72
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:33 pm
Location: King County

RE:Columbia River spring chinook sonar images.

Post by code3daddy » Thu Apr 08, 2010 12:11 am

Thanks for sharing. The images are great. Looks like they like holding in deeper water when they get a chance.

User avatar
sellis_414
Commander
Posts: 358
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 3:52 pm
Location: Wenatchee, WA

RE:Columbia River spring chinook sonar images.

Post by sellis_414 » Thu Apr 08, 2010 8:07 am

Rseas... What model of fish sonar did this come off of? Im looking at buying a new one and the clarity is amazing...
"If I'm not back in five minutes... just wait longer."

True Hero Rod Series Representative
Fetha Styx Associate

User avatar
rseas
Commander
Posts: 578
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:19 pm
Location: Skagit County

RE:Columbia River spring chinook sonar images.

Post by rseas » Thu Apr 08, 2010 9:34 am

The images are from my Humminbird 788ci Combo equipped with the QuadraBeam transducer.
Attachments
IMGP2098_001.jpg
IMGP2098_001.jpg (101.99 KiB) Viewed 4914 times
IMGP2092_001.jpg
IMGP2092_001.jpg (184.88 KiB) Viewed 4916 times
S00029_001.png
S00029_001.png (134.84 KiB) Viewed 4917 times
S00018_001.png
S00018_001.png (88.45 KiB) Viewed 4916 times

User avatar
Jacob
Warrant Officer
Posts: 109
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 2:32 pm
Location: Rochester

RE:Columbia River spring chinook sonar images.

Post by Jacob » Thu Apr 08, 2010 2:02 pm

thats pretty cool. it looks like there is some possible sturgeons on a couple of the images

User avatar
rseas
Commander
Posts: 578
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:19 pm
Location: Skagit County

RE:Columbia River spring chinook sonar images.

Post by rseas » Thu Apr 08, 2010 3:13 pm

I added a couple more screen shots and a couple pictures that I tried to attach to my report that didn't quite make it.

User avatar
salmonslayer117
Commander
Posts: 329
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 9:29 pm
Location: Puyallup, WA.

RE:Columbia River spring chinook sonar images.

Post by salmonslayer117 » Thu Apr 08, 2010 3:31 pm

That looks nice! I'd love to get into some of those. Nice imaging too!
When times get tough, just keep on fishin'!!!

scott080379
Commodore
Posts: 905
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 5:49 pm
Location: Kitsap, WA

RE:Columbia River spring chinook sonar images.

Post by scott080379 » Mon Apr 12, 2010 6:05 am

I spent all day out there yesterday with NOTHING and was even went with a guide. My first guide trip, not sure I will do that again.

I saw about 8 fish get pulled in on boats and about 8 to 10 fish being pulled in my plunkers.

User avatar
Gringo Pescador
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 2564
Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 8:35 am

RE:Columbia River spring chinook sonar images.

Post by Gringo Pescador » Mon Apr 12, 2010 6:34 am

scott080379 wrote:I spent all day out there yesterday with NOTHING and was even went with a guide. My first guide trip, not sure I will do that again.
Sorry to hear it Scott, I've been there, more than once - pay a lot of $$ for a boat ride. But bottom line is guide or not, fishing is still fishing..
I fish not because I regard fishing as being terribly important, but because I suspect that so many of the other concerns of men are equally unimportant, and not nearly so much fun. ~ John Volker

scott080379
Commodore
Posts: 905
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 5:49 pm
Location: Kitsap, WA

RE:Columbia River spring chinook sonar images.

Post by scott080379 » Mon Apr 12, 2010 7:06 am

Gringo Pescador wrote:
scott080379 wrote:I spent all day out there yesterday with NOTHING and was even went with a guide. My first guide trip, not sure I will do that again.
Sorry to hear it Scott, I've been there, more than once - pay a lot of $$ for a boat ride. But bottom line is guide or not, fishing is still fishing..
Yes we were fishing but nice boat tour of the Columbia. Sucks when you see people catching fish and you see they are using something your guide doesn't want to use.....but everyone that is cathcing is using it. Guide or not if something is working for EVERYONE else why wouldn't want to at least give it a try?

User avatar
Gringo Pescador
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 2564
Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 8:35 am

RE:Columbia River spring chinook sonar images.

Post by Gringo Pescador » Mon Apr 12, 2010 9:36 am

scott080379 wrote:
Gringo Pescador wrote:
scott080379 wrote:I spent all day out there yesterday with NOTHING and was even went with a guide. My first guide trip, not sure I will do that again.
Sorry to hear it Scott, I've been there, more than once - pay a lot of $$ for a boat ride. But bottom line is guide or not, fishing is still fishing..
Yes we were fishing but nice boat tour of the Columbia. Sucks when you see people catching fish and you see they are using something your guide doesn't want to use.....but everyone that is cathcing is using it. Guide or not if something is working for EVERYONE else why wouldn't want to at least give it a try?
You're right - THAT I would have a problem with..
I fish not because I regard fishing as being terribly important, but because I suspect that so many of the other concerns of men are equally unimportant, and not nearly so much fun. ~ John Volker

User avatar
rseas
Commander
Posts: 578
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:19 pm
Location: Skagit County

RE:Columbia River spring chinook sonar images.

Post by rseas » Mon Apr 12, 2010 10:49 am

Regarding our trip last week, Tuesday night when I saw that the river was out I should have pulled up stakes and headed up to the I-5 stretch of river. I have since heard that it was near limit fishing. Oh-well it was still a great trip.

scott080379
Commodore
Posts: 905
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 5:49 pm
Location: Kitsap, WA

RE:Columbia River spring chinook sonar images.

Post by scott080379 » Tue Apr 13, 2010 10:29 am

Yes that is where the fish were and bitting. But tons of boats, made for an interresting trip with the hundreds of boats in a small area.

User avatar
2000subaru
Commander
Posts: 552
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 12:13 pm
Location: Bonney Lake - D. South

RE:Columbia River spring chinook sonar images.

Post by 2000subaru » Tue Apr 13, 2010 6:51 pm

Poor-mans Side Imaging! I hear that the 788CI with the quad Beam is a pretty sweet setup. Congrats on getting awesome images, too bad on the catch ratio though. Better luck next time.
Image

User avatar
rseas
Commander
Posts: 578
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:19 pm
Location: Skagit County

RE:Columbia River spring chinook sonar images.

Post by rseas » Wed Apr 14, 2010 5:37 am

rseas wrote:Although opportunity was in our favor we didn’t manage to bring a fish to the net. Very strange couple days of fishing. We were using custom tied 3 hook mooching leaders and still getting short bites. I would not take the rods out of the holder until the fish was actively pulling out line and we still farmed everything hooked. That said great trip and thought that I would share our Columbia River springer sonar images. So with out further a due…for your drooling enjoyment!
It just dawned on me, I pre-tie all hooks for a trip and I had purchased 25 packs of budget hooks to make my leaders with. They were 1/4 the price of the Owner, Mustad or other hooks that I would normally buy. Geeze that was stupid, many lost hookups to save 20 bucks on hooks...

Post Reply