No Gas Motor Allowed Lakes

Lake fishing topics and discussions belong in this forum. Please, don't post reports in the forum.
Forum rules
Forum Post Guidelines: This Forum is rated “Family Friendly”. Civil discussions are encouraged and welcomed. Name calling, negative, harassing, or threatening comments will be removed and may result in suspension or IP Ban without notice. Please refer to the Terms of Service and Forum Guidelines post for more information.
Blackmouth
Lieutenant
Posts: 250
Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2008 12:27 am
Location: Seattle

RE:No Gas Motor Allowed Lakes

Post by Blackmouth » Tue Apr 28, 2009 7:25 pm

Rob G. wrote: Oh, yeah..I can't wait for the 2 pole rule.....I'd love to still fish and cast at the same time.....have fun guys!
That is going to be a disaster. Hopefully it will only apply to trout lakes.

More lakes SHOULD be electric or non motorized lakes. Much nicer environment to fish in when you don't hear motors everywhere.

User avatar
Mike Carey
Owner/Editor
Owner/Editor
Posts: 7765
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 10:56 am
Location: Redmond, WA
Contact:

RE:No Gas Motor Allowed Lakes

Post by Mike Carey » Tue Apr 28, 2009 7:27 pm

well, this thread got kind of hot under the collar. As people can see I'm pretty passionate about that lake.

Joe H, I hope all is well on your side of the computer screen. The last thing I'd want to do is drive off a reader from the site.
Image

"Takers get the honey, Givers sing the blues".

User avatar
kzoo
Commodore
Posts: 1319
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 7:01 am
Location: Bellevue

RE:No Gas Motor Allowed Lakes

Post by kzoo » Tue Apr 28, 2009 7:27 pm

My favorite is Green Lake. You can't have any motors at all (that includes electric), but the crew team can have their outboards running around the lake.

User avatar
Aaron
Owner/Engineer
Owner/Engineer
Posts: 1635
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 9:08 pm
Location: Spokane, WA

RE:No Gas Motor Allowed Lakes

Post by Aaron » Tue Apr 28, 2009 7:33 pm

Blackmouth wrote:
Rob G. wrote: Oh, yeah..I can't wait for the 2 pole rule.....I'd love to still fish and cast at the same time.....have fun guys!
That is going to be a disaster. Hopefully it will only apply to trout lakes.
How so? It has no effect on the amount of fish you can catch, only how fast you can catch them. It won't affect Bass fishermen... it's likely you can't cast and retrieve more than one pole at a time... in fact, it will probably mean you'll have more time to yourselves on the lakes since the trout fishermen will be done faster.
Aaron
Owner/Software Engineer
Image

2009 Hewescraft 20' ProV
2009 Mercury Optimax 150
2012 Tohatsu 8hp 4-stroke
Minn Kota Terrova #80 i-Pilot
Humminbird 959ci HD DI
Baystar Hydraulic Steering
Traxstech Fishing System

User avatar
Hal
Warrant Officer
Posts: 109
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 2:27 pm
Location: On the water...

RE:No Gas Motor Allowed Lakes

Post by Hal » Tue Apr 28, 2009 7:33 pm

swedefish4life1 wrote:Finally Mikie:-$ fastball right down the plate 97 mph with movement!:cheers: His pole hangs a flag and lights his rod is clear :cyclopsan :compress: :shaking: :-k :scratch:

Just don't let me watch that diamond back Video the Creatine is one day UPS!#-o :colors:
Drugs are bad, M...kay...
I am the mayor of ball cap land BOW to me ...

User avatar
BassinBomber
Admiral
Posts: 1791
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 6:12 pm
Location: Seattle
Contact:

RE:No Gas Motor Allowed Lakes

Post by BassinBomber » Tue Apr 28, 2009 7:38 pm

Drugs are bad, M...kay....

"Why would you say that"? Curious!

BB
Last edited by Anonymous on Tue Apr 28, 2009 7:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Passion-4-Bassin"

Blackmouth
Lieutenant
Posts: 250
Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2008 12:27 am
Location: Seattle

RE:No Gas Motor Allowed Lakes

Post by Blackmouth » Tue Apr 28, 2009 7:41 pm

Aaron wrote:
Blackmouth wrote:
Rob G. wrote: Oh, yeah..I can't wait for the 2 pole rule.....I'd love to still fish and cast at the same time.....have fun guys!
That is going to be a disaster. Hopefully it will only apply to trout lakes.
How so? It has no effect on the amount of fish you can catch, only how fast you can catch them. It won't affect Bass fishermen... it's likely you can't cast and retrieve more than one pole at a time... in fact, it will probably mean you'll have more time to yourselves on the lakes since the trout fishermen will be done faster.
I know it only has no effect on the amount of fish you catch. You just can catch them quicker theoretically with two setups versus one.

I've fished on lakes in states where it is legal to have two rods. You DO have clueless fishermen who think two rods= two limits. Believe it or not, but that is the case.

You do have more traffic in the water and more tangles. Its going to be miserable trolling too when people have two lines out.

The biggest problem with the two rod rule is that shore access shrinks as the number of lines in the water increases.

User avatar
Jake Dogfish
Commander
Posts: 407
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 7:58 pm
Location: Des Moines

RE:No Gas Motor Allowed Lakes

Post by Jake Dogfish » Wed Apr 29, 2009 3:44 am

Joe, the "two pole stamp" that you are refering to has to be purchased, and it will cost $20. It is said it will only be allowed on certain bodies of water so we will have to wait and see where and when.
I think its a great law not to allow the rich people with there big fancy boats to go fish my small lake and drip oil all over. BTW, I am a proud liberal and a environmentalist so you are allowed to hate me. ;)

User avatar
driftercn83
Petty Officer
Posts: 91
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 10:33 am
Location: 214 oak manor pl, Pittsburgh, Pa 15235
Contact:

RE:No Gas Motor Allowed Lakes

Post by driftercn83 » Wed Apr 29, 2009 5:57 am

I am not here to start any fights butr my beilief is that and since I own one and dont want five million boats is that that if is not being used then your fine. if more oil drips when its up leave it down I. the boat I have is a 14 ft lund the only boat I have I dont have money to buy 5 diffent boats for different situations. the motor is a 25 hp and can not be removed cause its to heavy. I am also a fish bio for the state of WA as well as a hatchery tech and I have taken notice to this cause some lakes say no motors yet the regs say eletiric okay. buit the point is thats prejudice to say your bout is 14ft and the motor cant be removed there for you cant fish this lake. the bayliner thing though is ridiculous. my boat is half that size. if your not using it then you should be fine.
Last edited by Anonymous on Wed Apr 29, 2009 6:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
An old man once told me that if you stick a worm on a hook drop it over the bank you can feed your self for life. I tried it modified it and geez I am beating them off with a broom now.


" Talking about the way it used to be. Skittley dit dat dow doo day. we used to pull Stripers out of san pablo bay. now the delta waters go down so cal and the stripers faded away.." (Primus)

User avatar
Hal
Warrant Officer
Posts: 109
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 2:27 pm
Location: On the water...

RE:No Gas Motor Allowed Lakes

Post by Hal » Wed Apr 29, 2009 7:30 am

Aaron wrote:
Blackmouth wrote:
Rob G. wrote: Oh, yeah..I can't wait for the 2 pole rule.....I'd love to still fish and cast at the same time.....have fun guys!
That is going to be a disaster. Hopefully it will only apply to trout lakes.
How so? It has no effect on the amount of fish you can catch, only how fast you can catch them. It won't affect Bass fishermen... it's likely you can't cast and retrieve more than one pole at a time... in fact, it will probably mean you'll have more time to yourselves on the lakes since the trout fishermen will be done faster.


Trolling...Im all for 2 poles, but to say that it has no effect on the amount of fish you catch is wrong.
I am the mayor of ball cap land BOW to me ...

User avatar
swedefish4life1
Admiral
Posts: 1715
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 11:14 pm
Contact:

RE:No Gas Motor Allowed Lakes

Post by swedefish4life1 » Wed Apr 29, 2009 9:53 am

Your finally Correct:cheers: a Pole#-o is to hang lights and flags off of!
Running 2 or 22 you will have a stringer of lights:-$ the UV Glow impact that could help#-o :cyclopsan

Now if you had a Fishing Rod:-$ or 2 that might Create a fish or 20 :dwarf: :colors: :clown:

Fish ON!!!! lol

User avatar
Anglinarcher
Admiral
Posts: 1831
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 1:28 pm
Location: Eastern Washington

RE:No Gas Motor Allowed Lakes

Post by Anglinarcher » Wed Apr 29, 2009 10:04 am

Wow, from gas motors in a no gas motors lake to shall we have two rods or not.

:-" For just a moment, I thought I was in the off topic area. LOL I kind of feel right at home.

For the record, I am a Washington Transplant. I kind of came here kicking and screaming, against my will (followed the job), but now that I am here, I love it. Having said that, consider that I have lived, worked, and fished in 7, yes Seven, states. I have seen so very many rules, and I have seen how so may rules work, and don't work.

I was surprised to see the two rod rule come to Washington, but I have seen it in Idaho, and now in Montana. To be honest, I have not seen much of a difference. Most people don't buy into the second rod (permit), so except for the trollers, often with planner boards or downriggers to begin with, you just don't have that many people using it. Sure, the rule is occasionally abused, but so are so many other rules. I suspect that, considering Washington State is so liberal in the first place, that the rule has been critically reviewed, and re-reviewed, and the impact has been considered minimal. In the South, and a lot of the Mid West, multiple rods are the norm, and it just doesn't cause the problems that many think it will. I suspect that the 2nd rod will be primarily used by trout fishermen, and perhaps some walleye trollers, and maybe, just maybe, by me for big old Catfish, but I don't see the impact that many fear. Again, the rule is new to Washington, but not new to fish management, so if there was indeed a problem, I just didn't see Washington State ever allowing it.

Now, back to the topic, the internal combustion motor in a lake prohibited from having one. I had a discussion with a WDFW manager about this recently. He asked me about my position on the law, because many laws can be changed by the prodding of the people (look at the 50" minimum size on Tiger Musky). I'll bet this was the first time that guy ever heard me stumble over my words. I hate to admit it, but I just don't know.

Sure, there is some concern about oil in the water, but there is more oil in the watershed from paved roads then there is from boat motors. Also, why not just require motors to switch to more environmentally friendly synthetics? I have switch, for other reasons, and it is worth it. Still, we feel good when we say we don't want oil in the water, don't we?!

How about the oil and gas driven boat that removes the motor and then goes to the lake. Legal? Of course, but how many of those boats have oil and gas spilled all over the inside of the boat, oil that often washes into the water due to leaky boats in the first place? Still, we need to start somewhere, don't we?

If we are trying to keep safety up and speeds down, why not impose a speed limit on the body of water. I see several bodies on my side of the state with 10 MPH speed limits, but these are imposed by the Counties apparently, because they are not in the fishing regulations. Still, if the purpose is...........................

If removing the internal combustion motor is adequate to make it legal, then what is the harm of tilting the motor up? I have never seen a motor the "leaks" oil when tilted up verses lowered. And, they can indeed leek oil, then why not allow the motor shaft and prop to be covered by a plastic bag? Again, you have at least as much protection as removing the motor entirely.

Each and every option I mentioned has been tried in at least one other state I have fished in, and each state feels it works for them. Are they that much different then us. Why is our law best, and there law is not?


I see two things happening in this thread, one people are not debating the issue, but arguing it. I encourage people to step back a little and take a deep breath. You are not right just because you can write more or scream louder, nor are you wrong because you cannot formulate your views more clearly. Consider other people's views, think about them, then offer logical and informed reasons why it is or is not so.

Second, I think we are in a time of national, and state, turmoil. We need a way to vent over issue, ideas, and sometimes we need people we can scream at and too. I feel your need, I resemble that remark. Come join us in the Off Topic area.

Last, remember that everyone of us would probably be friends if we met on the lake, so let's not get too angry with each other just because we can't place a name with a face.:-"
Too much water, so many fish, too little time.

User avatar
swedefish4life1
Admiral
Posts: 1715
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 11:14 pm
Contact:

RE:No Gas Motor Allowed Lakes

Post by swedefish4life1 » Wed Apr 29, 2009 10:14 am

Great points well served:-$ and I am happy I just woke up and hold not one drop of anger at all:cheers:

A Team always beats one Warrior:-$:viking: and each has his views and should be respected for them as long as you know were your Rod is and for:thumleft: :thumright =d>

User avatar
Bodofish
Vice Admiral Three Stars
Posts: 5407
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 12:59 pm
Location: Woodinville
Contact:

RE:No Gas Motor Allowed Lakes

Post by Bodofish » Wed Apr 29, 2009 12:45 pm

I beg to differ................:-& :-& :-& :-& You can have a fishun poe if your south of the mason dixon line.
Build a man a fire and he's warm for the night. Light a man on fire and he's warm the rest of his life!

User avatar
swedefish4life1
Admiral
Posts: 1715
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 11:14 pm
Contact:

RE:No Gas Motor Allowed Lakes

Post by swedefish4life1 » Wed Apr 29, 2009 1:13 pm

Cain I might add! #-o LMAO!!!:cheers: :cyclopsan

User avatar
ruthven78
Commander
Posts: 516
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 2:33 pm
Location: Spokane, WA
Contact:

RE:No Gas Motor Allowed Lakes

Post by ruthven78 » Wed Apr 29, 2009 2:06 pm

Im not vet but I believe we can pronounce this horse dead
Last edited by Anonymous on Wed Apr 29, 2009 2:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Snakes dont have any arms that's why they dont wear vests - Stephen Wright

User avatar
tnj8222
Admiral
Posts: 1693
Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 9:42 pm
Location: Renton Highlands
Contact:

RE:No Gas Motor Allowed Lakes

Post by tnj8222 » Wed Apr 29, 2009 4:07 pm

Joe Heater wrote: Some get it and some don't. Ya that's me, the guy that don't get it. Are you serious?
i am serious, i think laws need to be followed. do you not agree? dont do anything you wouldnt do in front of a cop or a game warden. im not saying the law is a good one, im just saying it exists. by saying that i think i "get it"
Anthony
http://static.photobucket.com/player.sw" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ... EO0054.mp4
if everyday was a good day there would be alot more fisherman.

User avatar
nwbasshunter
Petty Officer
Posts: 24
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 4:36 pm
Location: Graham, WA
Contact:

RE:No Gas Motor Allowed Lakes

Post by nwbasshunter » Fri May 01, 2009 9:04 pm

Not to keep beating the poor dead horse, but I found this interesting. I talked with one the persons in the Enforcement of WDFW about this subject and asked him if it would be alright if the gas tank was out of the boat and the motor was tilted up. He said yes, that he didn't see a problem at all. This just goes to show you that either they don't care or don't know.

User avatar
Mike Carey
Owner/Editor
Owner/Editor
Posts: 7765
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 10:56 am
Location: Redmond, WA
Contact:

RE:No Gas Motor Allowed Lakes

Post by Mike Carey » Fri May 01, 2009 10:01 pm

nwbasshunter wrote:Not to keep beating the poor dead horse, but I found this interesting. I talked with one the persons in the Enforcement of WDFW about this subject and asked him if it would be alright if the gas tank was out of the boat and the motor was tilted up. He said yes, that he didn't see a problem at all. This just goes to show you that either they don't care or don't know.
Sounds like a little of both. #-o
Image

"Takers get the honey, Givers sing the blues".

User avatar
hewesfisher
Admiral
Posts: 1886
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 8:20 am
Location: Spangle, WA

RE:No Gas Motor Allowed Lakes

Post by hewesfisher » Sat May 02, 2009 5:58 am

Anyone know what the fine is for fishing in a lake designated "No internal combustion engines allowed" from a boat with an internal combustion motor attached? In or out of the water?

I don't care how you feel about the law, it's already on the books, I want to know what it would cost someone if they meet a WDFW or county marine patrol officer that enforces the law as written.

Is it a $10 "feel good" about protecting the environment fine or is it a $150 bust your chops for not protecting the environment fine? For some, the pain inflicted by a hefty fine is sufficient to follow the law, for others, no amount matters at all, and still yet, others, (like me) obey the law because there's a reason it exists.

I'm just curious.:-"

IMO, the two rod rule portions in this thread should be removed and place in a separate post.:bball:
Phil

'09 Hewescraft 20' ProV
150hp Merc Optimax
8hp Merc 4-stroke
Raymarine DS600X HD Sounder
Raymarine a78 MultiFunctionDisplay
Raymarine DownVision
Raymarine SideVision
Baystar Hydraulic Steering
Trollmaster Pro II
Traxstech Fishing System
MotorGuide 75# Thrust Wireless Bow Mount

Post Reply