Puget sound steelhead

A place for readers to talk about river fishing in Washington.
Forum rules
Forum Post Guidelines: This Forum is rated “Family Friendly”. Civil discussions are encouraged and welcomed. Name calling, negative, harassing, or threatening comments will be removed and may result in suspension or IP Ban without notice. Please refer to the Terms of Service and Forum Guidelines post for more information. Thank you
Post Reply
primetime
Commander
Posts: 342
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 8:47 pm

Puget sound steelhead

Post by primetime » Sun Nov 08, 2015 3:54 pm

Write and let them know what you think. Hopefully they won't go with option one. Hopefully option 2 or 4. It would be interesting to see what the native brood stock hatchery would produce.

http://www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov ... _deis.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

denhambruce
Petty Officer
Posts: 53
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 7:50 am

Re: Puget sound steelhead

Post by denhambruce » Sun Nov 08, 2015 5:21 pm

For me I feel like #4 is the only solution. It promotes change which is what the Puget Sound needs. It Replaces the cookie cutter hatchery brats with what are essentially hatchery raised native steelhead. It won't mitigate the gene pool over time because the same fish wont be used year after year to breed the next stock of fish. Plus if they breed with wild fish it will not have any ill effects on their offspring. As far as fishing goes we would get good #'s of returning fish to target and since they're broodstock that means they'll have some shoulders on them! [thumbsup]

User avatar
spokey9
Captain
Posts: 795
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 11:18 am
Location: Arkansas

Re: Puget sound steelhead

Post by spokey9 » Sun Nov 08, 2015 7:04 pm

but the chambers creek stock typically return earlier so that helps to define the season to protect wild steelhead.
Fishing relaxes me. It's like yoga, except i still get to kill something.

fish vacuum
Petty Officer
Posts: 50
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:55 pm

Re: Puget sound steelhead

Post by fish vacuum » Sun Nov 08, 2015 8:35 pm

The state has made a real effort to get the hatchery fish returning early to avoid interactions with wild fish. Wild brood would return later and be more likely to mix with wild fish. Hatchery fish from wild parents might not be as bad as chambers fish if they spawn with native fish, but they would still be from a hatchery.
And how many wild fish would they take from the river to use? How many would be acceptable?

User avatar
Jakefish
Warrant Officer
Posts: 140
Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2009 3:35 pm
Location: Bellingham

Re: Puget sound steelhead

Post by Jakefish » Sun Nov 08, 2015 8:58 pm

The Vedder river (BC) has a native broodstock program, and hatchery fish still tend to return earlier than the wilds - toward the end of the season (March), hatchery fish become rare. When they return isn't as important as when they spawn - they can return in October but if they wait to spawn until May, they are spawning with wild fish. An issue with the Vedder hatchery fish is overcrowding, which leads to hormone issues and exaggerated growth among juveniles. The juveniles released are then much larger than the wild fish, and may make if difficult for the wild fish to compete. If a wild broodstock program is undertaken, it must be adequately funded to have sufficient space for the raising of the fry, enough power to pump water at the correct temperatures, and enough feed to avoid releasing the juveniles early. I'd love to see a wild broodstock program combined with enhancement of spawning habitat in our rivers. This would quickly pay dividends to anglers and tribal fishers alike.

User avatar
4steelhead
Warrant Officer
Posts: 104
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 7:51 pm

Re: Puget sound steelhead

Post by 4steelhead » Mon Nov 09, 2015 10:16 am

I too would like to catch bigger fish. Who wouldn't. But I fear more restrictions and shorter seasons if a wild brood is used. We currently enjoy a fish that returns much earlier than ESA listed steelhead. And still have shorter seasons than we did a few years ago. Some Puget Sound waters were shut down this year, not because of lack of hatchery fish, but because of low wild fish escapement. A discussion of limiting Forks rivers to bank anglers only, to limit wild fish encounters is bring talkyd about. As far as the Snohomish basin goes, let's keep the Chamber Creek early returning hatchery fish. Put them out there and catch as many as we can before the wild fish start to spawn.

obryan214
Commander
Posts: 422
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2011 11:14 pm
Location: Tacoma

Re: Puget sound steelhead

Post by obryan214 » Wed Nov 11, 2015 12:12 am

how about reintroducing chambers creek steelhead to chambers creek? the fish ladder on the south side is open. get rid of that wlkway on top of the dam so they can swim over it. put them in big enough numbers so I can fish them in MA13.

Post Reply