Northwest Fishing Reports

Posted: **Thu Apr 14, 2011 8:17 pm**

Make it so EVERY report HAS TO HAVE a fish specie selected or the report doesn't go thru.

Posted: **Thu Apr 14, 2011 8:24 pm**

I'll try to do a better job of filling them in if they were left blank.

Posted: **Thu Apr 14, 2011 8:31 pm**

They can't be left blank. That field is already required for all reports and has been for... years? The only reports that don't show the species are the old reports, and we are in the process of filling those in when we have time.

Posted: **Thu Apr 14, 2011 8:33 pm**

New report in the last few minutes has the specie blank. It's been doing that on some reports since I've been a member here.

Posted: **Thu Apr 14, 2011 8:44 pm**

Thanks! An example always helps track down a bug.

Posted: **Thu Apr 14, 2011 10:55 pm**

Aaron wrote:Thanks! An example always helps track down a bug.

Here's a couple Aaron,
4/9 Barclay report by RAWirth
4/9 Shoecraft report by slabs
4/5 Mattoon report by Duane Daniles
3/30 Sprague report by johnsgonefishin
3/24 Hog Canyon report by perch09

Posted: **Thu Apr 14, 2011 11:03 pm**

Hmm, I am failing to see why it is a big deal? Having it as an option is a nice feature, but usually if you read the report you know what they were fishing for??

Posted: **Thu Apr 14, 2011 11:07 pm**

Matt wrote:Hmm, I am failing to see why it is a big deal? Having it as an option is a nice feature, but usually if you read the report you know what they were fishing for??

Mostly so you don't HAVE to read the report to know what they were fishing for. It was the bass anglers that mostly requested that feature so they could weed out the trout reports and get to the bass reports easier.

Posted: **Thu Apr 14, 2011 11:09 pm**

Matt wrote:Hmm, I am failing to see why it is a big deal? Having it as an option is a nice feature, but usually if you read the report you know what they were fishing for??

because i don't feel like reading a dozen reports about some fish i'm NOT INTERESTED!!!!! IN!!!!!!!!!!

Posted: **Fri Apr 15, 2011 2:16 am**

congrats, twas a bug. Aaron, the species on Shoecraft was unselected, I went in and edited it.

Posted: **Fri Apr 15, 2011 3:08 am**

Amx wrote:
Matt wrote:Hmm, I am failing to see why it is a big deal? Having it as an option is a nice feature, but usually if you read the report you know what they were fishing for??
because i don't feel like reading a dozen reports about some fish i'm NOT INTERESTED!!!!! IN!!!!!!!!!!

Grumpy tonight? hahaha

Posted: **Fri Apr 15, 2011 3:37 am**

Matt wrote:
Amx wrote:
Matt wrote:Hmm, I am failing to see why it is a big deal? Having it as an option is a nice feature, but usually if you read the report you know what they were fishing for??
because i don't feel like reading a dozen reports about some fish i'm NOT INTERESTED!!!!! IN!!!!!!!!!!

Grumpy tonight? hahaha

yes

Posted: **Fri Apr 15, 2011 4:07 am**

Sorry to hear that, need a hug?

Posted: **Fri Apr 15, 2011 7:54 am**

Mike Carey wrote:congrats, twas a bug. Aaron, the species on Shoecraft was unselected, I went in and edited it.

Mike,
Shoecraft is still missing the species along with these:

4/9 Barclay report by RAWirth
4/9 Shoecraft report by slabs
4/5 Mattoon report by Duane Daniles
3/30 Sprague report by johnsgonefishin
3/24 Hog Canyon report by perch09

Posted: **Fri Apr 15, 2011 8:04 am**

I think I forgot to report species in my last one. It's obvious (well to me at least) that the target was trout but still.

Posted: **Fri Apr 15, 2011 12:49 pm**

Matt wrote:
Amx wrote:
Matt wrote:Hmm, I am failing to see why it is a big deal? Having it as an option is a nice feature, but usually if you read the report you know what they were fishing for??
because i don't feel like reading a dozen reports about some fish i'm NOT INTERESTED!!!!! IN!!!!!!!!!!

Grumpy tonight? hahaha

Must be the weather.

:-k

Posted: **Fri Apr 15, 2011 4:01 pm**

Matt wrote:Sorry to hear that, need a hug?

so it is ok for YOU to cry about a thread/article about an alligator biting a teen, that YOU didn't have to even open the thread, but it's not ok for ME to cry about having to open a report just to find out it is about a fish I'm not interested in and wasting my time? YOU might want to just chill out and not worry so much about others.

Posted: **Fri Apr 15, 2011 4:02 pm**

Gonefishing wrote:I think I forgot to report species in my last one. It's obvious (well to me at least) that the target was trout but still.

and no there is usually no way to really tell what a report is about by the lake being fished. it has to be opened and read.

Posted: **Fri Apr 15, 2011 4:38 pm**

Amx wrote:
Matt wrote:Sorry to hear that, need a hug?
so it is ok for YOU to cry about a thread/article about an alligator biting a teen, that YOU didn't have to even open the thread, but it's not ok for ME to cry about having to open a report just to find out it is about a fish I'm not interested in and wasting my time? YOU might want to just chill out and not worry so much about others.

Calm down tom! Arent mods here to keep the peace?

Posted: **Fri Apr 15, 2011 4:51 pm**

I AM being piecefull. [img=http://board.moparts.org/ubbthreads/ima ... laugh2.gif]u[/img] I COULD have said something else. [img=http://board.moparts.org/ubbthreads/ima ... /devil.gif]m[/img]

now if y'all will excuse me, after the automatic updating is now done, I have spend the next 1 and 1/2 hours going thru the computer and fixing the crap that just slowed down the computer.

PISSED? not ME.

Northwest Fishing Reports

fishing reports

fishing reports

RE:fishing reports

RE:fishing reports

RE:fishing reports

RE:fishing reports

RE:fishing reports

RE:fishing reports

RE:fishing reports

RE:fishing reports

RE:fishing reports

RE:fishing reports

RE:fishing reports

RE:fishing reports

RE:fishing reports

RE:fishing reports

RE:fishing reports

RE:fishing reports

RE:fishing reports

RE:fishing reports

RE:fishing reports