No motorized boats allowed...does this also mean electric
Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 2:58 pm
I was curious if the rule, "no motorized boats" included electric motors.
A free forum for the discussion of fishing the Inland Northwest.
http://stage.northwestfishingreports.com/Forum/
http://stage.northwestfishingreports.com/Forum/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=12197
Depends, but most likely yes.dea wrote:I was curious if the rule, "no motorized boats" included electric motors.
In all the lakes that I have been to, NO MOTORS means NO MOTORS. It has nothing to do with pollution. It has more to do with safety. Medical Lake has a lot of long distance swimmers using the lake. Fan Lake has a lot of children swimming in the lake. Both have a "no motors" rule.8Fish_box wrote: Most times no motor allowed means combustion motors. Electrics dont put out any polution.![]()
I spoke to the park ranger yesterday about this and he said that electric trolling motors were allowed. They didn't want boats with gas (internal combustion) motors.Marc Martyn wrote:In several instances, this is not clear because the state says one thing and the county says another.
Fish Lake by Cheney states in the WDFW regs that "no internal combustion motors allowed." However, Spokane County owns the property that Fish Lake sits on. In the park regulations, it clearly states "No motorized boats allowed".
Now the question rises, do they enforce the rule? For all the time that Spokane County has had control of Fish Lake, there has been no enforcement of the no motors rule. I have seen dozens of boats trolling with electric motors on the lake for the last 15-20 years.
It all boils down to who owns the body of water. In the case of Fish Lake, the game department will enforce the rules they have posted in their regulations. The county parks will enforce the rules they have for the park. Both are conflicting.
A couple of years ago, Medical Lake was listed in the WDFW regulations as "Electric motors only". The town of Medical Lake owns the lake and had a sign at the launch saying "No motors allowed". Someone finally convinced the WDFW to change their rules for Medical Lake to read "no motors allowed", therefore following the rules of the City Of Medical Lake.
It appears to me that the owner of the lake has the final word, not the WDFW.
On what lake and which park?geljockey wrote:I spoke to the park ranger yesterday about this and he said that electric trolling motors were allowed. They didn't want boats with gas (internal combustion) motors.Marc Martyn wrote:In several instances, this is not clear because the state says one thing and the county says another.
Fish Lake by Cheney states in the WDFW regs that "no internal combustion motors allowed." However, Spokane County owns the property that Fish Lake sits on. In the park regulations, it clearly states "No motorized boats allowed".
Now the question rises, do they enforce the rule? For all the time that Spokane County has had control of Fish Lake, there has been no enforcement of the no motors rule. I have seen dozens of boats trolling with electric motors on the lake for the last 15-20 years.
It all boils down to who owns the body of water. In the case of Fish Lake, the game department will enforce the rules they have posted in their regulations. The county parks will enforce the rules they have for the park. Both are conflicting.
A couple of years ago, Medical Lake was listed in the WDFW regulations as "Electric motors only". The town of Medical Lake owns the lake and had a sign at the launch saying "No motors allowed". Someone finally convinced the WDFW to change their rules for Medical Lake to read "no motors allowed", therefore following the rules of the City Of Medical Lake.
It appears to me that the owner of the lake has the final word, not the WDFW.
Bear Lake (Bear Lake Regional Park) and Fish Lake (Fish Lake Regional Park) in Spokane Co.Marc Martyn wrote:On what lake and which park?geljockey wrote:I spoke to the park ranger yesterday about this and he said that electric trolling motors were allowed. They didn't want boats with gas (internal combustion) motors.Marc Martyn wrote:In several instances, this is not clear because the state says one thing and the county says another.
Fish Lake by Cheney states in the WDFW regs that "no internal combustion motors allowed." However, Spokane County owns the property that Fish Lake sits on. In the park regulations, it clearly states "No motorized boats allowed".
Now the question rises, do they enforce the rule? For all the time that Spokane County has had control of Fish Lake, there has been no enforcement of the no motors rule. I have seen dozens of boats trolling with electric motors on the lake for the last 15-20 years.
It all boils down to who owns the body of water. In the case of Fish Lake, the game department will enforce the rules they have posted in their regulations. The county parks will enforce the rules they have for the park. Both are conflicting.
A couple of years ago, Medical Lake was listed in the WDFW regulations as "Electric motors only". The town of Medical Lake owns the lake and had a sign at the launch saying "No motors allowed". Someone finally convinced the WDFW to change their rules for Medical Lake to read "no motors allowed", therefore following the rules of the City Of Medical Lake.
It appears to me that the owner of the lake has the final word, not the WDFW.
Ditto... I to have spoken to the WDFW about this. It comes up everything Spring for as long as the website has been here. Their point was made to me clearly..." What the regs say about motor allowances... has only to do with fishing" What you read in the WDFW regs. on motors does not necessarily apply to pleasure boating in a given lake. Go to the county for that.G-Man wrote:Marc,
I see the WDFW motor rules as being applicable just to the time you are fishing and not meant to override local regulations. Hence the inclusion of the word "fishing" to the definitions provided in the pamphlet.